Optimum Health


Pollan says health-care reform will fail unless we change the way we eat
September 16, 2009, 12:37 AM
Filed under: Food and it's Impact on Our Health, Going Green; How and Why...

From The Grist

Pollan NPR’s Guy Raz: What if health care is overhauled and it doesn’t change the American diet in any way?
Michael Pollan: We’ll go broke. If we don’t get a handle on these health care costs, the new system or the old system, we’ll go broke. And that’s why I think that really food is the elephant in the room when we’re talking about health care.

First in The New York Times last week and then on NPR this weekend, Michael Pollan made that point that if we want to fix our health-care system, we have to fix our food system.

From his op-ed in the Times:

[T]he fact that the United States spends twice as much per person as most European countries on health care can be substantially explained, as a study released last month says, by our being fatter. …
That’s why our success in bringing health care costs under control ultimately depends on whether Washington can summon the political will to take on and reform a second, even more powerful industry: the food industry. …
Cheap food is going to be popular as long as the social and environmental costs of that food are charged to the future. There’s lots of money to be made selling fast food and then treating the diseases that fast food causes. One of the leading products of the American food industry has become patients for the American health care industry.

But even with that grim diagnosis, Pollan is optimistic about the future, arguing that if insurance companies are required to accept everyone, as called for by even weak health-reform legislation now in Congress, then the insurance industry will become a powerful ally in fight for better food and against the agribusiness lobby.

Grist’s Tom Laskawy is less optimistic, noting that the poor and the elderly—the most unhealthy groups—are likely to keep getting their health coverage from the government (Medicare, Medicaid, and the VA) and not the insurance industry.

Still, both Pollan and Laskawy are encouraged by New York City’s new anti-soda ad campaign, which Laskawy says is supported by health insurance companies.  Will we see more such public-health campaigns around the country, no matter what happens with health-care reform in Washington, D.C.?

Here’s an ad from NYC’s campaign:

Anti-soda ad

I say low fat milk is as bad a choice as the soda…both are products of corn!    Eat grass fed meat and only eat dairy if it’s organic and straight from the cow!



The Voice of Reason Concerning the Whole Foods Boycott
August 18, 2009, 10:28 PM
Filed under: Food and it's Impact on Our Health, Going Green; How and Why...

Michael Bluejay’s site has long been a favorite of mine. I don’t think there is a better blog out there that covers how to conserve electricity. Following is what he wrote about the Whole Foods Boycott.  Now, frankly, I do not shop at Whole Foods for many reasons.  I support local business as much as possible. I realize some folks in some areas of the country have no choices, in Jacksonville, Fl, we do.  I support businesses who keep the money in our community, I support those who treat their employees well, I support those who buy locally as much as possible and I support those businesses who have honest, open corporate practices such as Publix, who do an amazing amount of community service and also truly care about their customers.

I do not support Winn Dixie because of the horrible way they treat their employees; of this I know about personally after working as a Food Service Manager with them.

I do not support Native Sun because of their dishonesty and the way they treat their employees.

The only health food stores in Jacksonville that I do support are Grassroots, Bio-max and The Good Earth.  I have long supported Southern Nutrition but their mostly empty shelves nowadays have made me give up on them. Grassroots is by far my favorite, it has an old fashioned, homey feel to it, it is in way cool 5 Points…and best of all, it’s a great, well stocked store by people who know tier stuff. 

But, back to what Michael has to say about the whole thing..I have to agree.

Whole Foods Market: What’s wrong with Whole Foods?

Whole Foods Market does some good things. For starters, they practically created the modern market for organic foods single-handedly. Organics would likely still be hard to find and a lot more expensive (rather than a little more expensive) were it not for their efforts. Whole Foods also requires its suppliers to meet standards for humane treatment of farm animals, which has greatly improved the lives of millions of creatures. They also support the Fair Trade movement and have a more democratic workplace than can be found in just about any other organization of its size. So giving credit where it’s due, Whole Foods has often been a force for good.

But just because a company sells natural foods doesn’t mean it can do no wrong. Many of Whole Foods’ actions have been controversial, especially where their labor practices are concerned. As the Texas Observer put it, "People shop at Whole Foods not just because it offers organic produce and natural foods, but because it claims to run its business in a way that demonstrates a genuine concern for the community, the environment, and the ‘whole planet,’ in the words of its motto. In reality, Whole Foods has gone on a corporate feeding frenzy in recent years, swallowing rival retailers across the country…. The expansion is driven by a simple and lucrative business strategy: high prices and low wages." (1)

We’re not suggesting that anyone stop shopping at Whole Foods and we’re not calling for any kind of boycott (see sidebar at left) — we just want consumers to realize that even a company that puts on a socially-responsible face doesn’t always live up to its own hype.

Here are fourteen questionable aspects of Whole Foods Market:



(1) Aggressive monopolization. Tons of independent co-ops throughout the country don’t exist any more because Whole Foods bought them out. Whole Foods also absorbed all its significant competitors (Wild Oats, Bread & Circus, Fresh Fields, Bread of Life, Merchant of Vino, Nature’s Heartland, Food for Thought, Harry’s Farmers Market, Mrs. Gooch’s Natural Foods Markets, and U.K.-based Fresh & Wild). (2)  They’ve thus created a near-monopoly in the natural foods grocery business. Consumers are better served by a diversity of stores, but Whole Foods has been trying to wipe out the competition — and has been quite successful at doing so.

(2) Failure to support farmworkers. When United Farm Worker activists passed out literature at an Austin Whole Foods Market, Whole Foods called the cops and had them arrested. Embarrassed by the public outcry, Whole Foods then promised to support the UFW’s grape boycott, but then broke that promise when it moved the store a couple of blocks away, saying the agreement applied only to the old location. They also produced deceptive literature for their customers blasting the farmworkers group and describing farmworker conditions as being no problem at all. About this, the UFW says, "Several major cases have been tried in states such as North Carolina and Florida during recent years where it was found that workers were being kept by their employers in a state of virtual slavery. This is worlds away from the ideal and naïve (and disingenuous) information put out by Whole Foods." (3,4)

(3) Fierceless devotion to profit. It’s not unusual for a business to try to maximize profit. But when the business puts on a socially-responsible face, consumers have the hope that the business will put "Doing the Right Thing" above "Making More Money". That’s not always the case at Whole Foods. It’s precisely why Whole Foods swallows its competitors, sells certain questionable products, and keeps wages as low as possible. Common Dreams says, "A closer look at the company’s business practices and Mackey’s ideas about business and society reveals a vision not that different from a McDonald’s or a Wal-Mart. In fact, the Whole Foods business model is more or less the standard stuff of Fortune 500 ambition. This is a vision of mega-chain retailing that involves strategic swallowing up (or driving out of business) of smaller retail competitors. It is a business model that objectively complements the long-term industrialization of organics (that is, large-scale corporate farms) over small family farms. It is also a vision in which concerns about social responsibility do not necessarily apply where less publicly visible company suppliers are concerned. Subsidiaries of cigarette manufacturers (for example, Altria, owner of Kraft’s organic products) or low-wage exploiters of minority workers (such as California Bottling Co., Inc., makers of Whole Foods’ s private-label water) are apparently welcome partners in this particular eco-corporate version of ‘the sustainable future.’" (2,5)

(4) Refusal to carry only turtle-safe shrimp. When Earth Island Institute asked Whole Foods to carry only shrimp caught in nets certified to protect endangered sea turtles, Whole Foods flatly refused. (1)

(5) CEO posing as someone else on the Internet. For seven years, Whole Foods CEO John Mackey posted on the Yahoo Finance board about his company and its competitors while pretending to be someone else. By trashing rival Wild Oats, their stock price could drop and he could buy them out for less money. Mackey also had the gall to anonymously praise himself. ("I like Mackey’s haircut. I think he looks cute!") (6)  He didn’t stop there: He also criticized specific employees, under the cover of anonymity. Daily Kos said of this, "The very idea of the founder and CEO of a major national corporation hiding behind a pseudonym to lambaste one of his own hourly wage earners on an online message board says something about the personal moral integrity of union-busting executives." (7)  After being discovered, he was unrepentant, trying to justify his behavior in a long blog post, and making a point to say specifically that his actions weren’t unethical. (8, 9)

(6) Poor working conditions. Workers organizing for a union in Madison said, "The ridiculously high turnover rate, wages that are lower than the industry standard, pervasive lack of respect, constant understaffing, absence of a legally-binding grievance procedure, and other poor and unfair labor practices-all of which have led to widespread low morale-highlight the simple fact that workers ultimately have no say in the terms and conditions of their employment at any Whole Foods Market-not just Madison. Workers are not recognized or appreciated for their contributions. Instead, Whole Foods relies on worker apathy and lack of investment in their jobs to keep turnover high, and for the most part, wages, benefits, and other working conditions poor. This environment should be unacceptable for any workplace." (1)

(7) Anti-Union. Whole Foods is so fiercely anti-union it has actually fired employees who were trying to organize one. As Common Dreams says, "Whole Foods matches Wal-Mart in its reputation for corporate anti-unionism. It’s a hostility rooted in a management whose ‘core values’ are intrinsically patrician and antidemocratic. The latter qualities were revealed in all their dismal hypocrisy most forcefully in 2002 when employees of the chain’s Madison, Wisconsin, store voted to unionize and join the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW). In a story that caught the attention of the New York Times and other media, Mackey had what might be described as a New Age temper tantrum, treating the specter of collective bargaining at one of his stores as a disaster of almost unspeakable proportions….The yearlong effort to defeat Madison’s first organizing drive revealed Mackey as a "socially enlightened" poseur, a New Age business type who talks about love and ecological footprints and other enlightened things, but who turns to the hard boot of corporate scare tactics and disinformation when confronted with a group of employees who dare to assert their democratic right to self-representation." (1,10)
And "In 2006, after truck drivers working at its San Francisco-based distribution center voted to unionize with the Teamsters. The company fired two of the drivers, altered its sick-leave policy, froze wage increases, refused to provide information to the union that was necessary to negotiate a contract, and ‘harassed and disciplined employees,’ found NLRB investigators, who concluded that ‘Whole Foods engaged in a variety of [illegal] retaliatory measures to discourage union activity.’ An out-of-court settlement required Whole Foods to reinstate the employees and reverse some of its policies." (20)

(8) Low Wages. Whole Foods has been widely criticized for keeping wages low. "Companies such as Whole Foods or other non-union chain competitors are paying many of their hourly employees what in late 1960s dollars would be equivalent to the minimum wage or below." (1) And they can certainly afford to pay more. Whole Foods stores bring in $800 per square foot in a year, double the industry average. (11)

(9) Refusal to come clean on the use of GMO’s and toxic chemicals in its products. "Whole Foods is still not fully transparent about the use of GMOs in store-brand products, and has ignored shareholder requests for information on the use of toxic chemicals in products like baby bottles that are sold in stores." (12)  Whole Foods also asked shareholders to vote against a resolution asking Whole Foods to report about endocrine disruptors and other toxic chemicals in its products. (13)

(10) Selling dangerous food. You might think that with a company that champions healthy eating, anything in their store would be safe to eat. You’d be wrong. Whole Foods sold fish so toxic in mercury that one customer’s blood levels had to be reported to the Center for Disease Control. (17) Whole Foods didn’t start identifying potentially mercury-laden fish in its California stores until the government forced them to do so. Even then, a quarter of Whole Foods stores failed to display proper signage as required by law. (18)

(11) Misleading shoppers about its support of small farmers. Signs at Whole Foods Market say, "Help the Small Farmer — Buying organic supports the small, family farmers that make up a large percentage of organic food producers." What they’re not telling you is that while the number of family farmers is a large percentage of the total, overwhelming majority of organic output comes from corporate farms. As Slate put it: "There are a lot of small, family-run organic farmers, but their share of the organic crop in this country, and of the produce sold at Whole Foods, is minuscule." Slate also pointed out that Whole Foods has pictures and profiles of small organic farmers in their stores, but doesn’t actually carry products from those farmers. (14)

(12) Gagging shareholders. Whole Foods refused to let shareholders speak about shareholder resolutions at its annual meeting. " ‘Given that the annual shareholder meeting is the one time each year that top executives and directors have to show up and be accountable to shareholders, it is unconscionable for companies not to allow proponents to make a short statement in support of their proposals,’ said Beth Young, senior research associate for The Corporate Library (TCL), which assesses corporate governance….’It also seems to flatly contradict the company’s pledge to ‘recognize everyone’s right to be listened to and heard regardless of their point of view,” Mr. Herbert told SocialFunds.com. ‘Whole Foods should recognize that any company that presents itself as socially responsible, as it does, is an easy target for a cynical press and public when it fails to uphold reasonable standards of corporate practice.’" (15)

(13) Obfuscating executive compensation. Forbes magazine says, "Media reports frequently tout Whole Foods’ pay policy, which caps the chief executive’s salary and bonus at 14 times the average worker’s pay. The Wall Street Journal, Slate.com, Harvard Business Review and BusinessWeek have all mentioned the pay cap, generally in favorable terms. But they all omitted one thing: stock options." When you count stock options, Mackey really made close to $3 million, or eighty-two times the average workers’ salary. Forbes continues, "Whole Foods manages to obscure Mackey’s total pay package by ballyhooing the salary cap." A company is certainly entitled to pay its execs whatever it wants, but the issue here is that WF is deceptive about how much its execs actually receive, relative to the lower-paid workers. (16)

(14) Forcing smaller competitors to hand over private financial data. Whole Foods has been trying to force many of its smaller competitors to hand over private sales and financial data about those smaller stores. Whole Foods already holds a massive advantage due to its size, but that’s apparently not enough for them. As one of the harassed smaller groceries put it, "Allowing Whole Foods to look through all of our private information about how we operate and what our plans are for the future unfairly adds to their already large size and financial advantage. We’ve been able to build a successful local business being David against their Goliath, and we’re happy to keep doing that, but we do object to having one hand tied behind our back." (19)



Why Is There Still an Endocrine Disruptor In My Toothpaste?
July 21, 2009, 12:06 PM
Filed under: Environmental Issues, Going Green; How and Why...

by Lloyd Alter, Toronto on 07.17.09

total triclosan image

Three years ago John first wrote There’s A Frog Disruptor In My Soap, including a scary list of products containing the bacteriocide Triclosan. We keep asking Why Is There Still a Frog Disruptor In My Toothpaste? and nothing changes. With the current swine-flu induced hand washing craze, more people are dosing themselves with more Triclosan, even though alcohol-based products work just as well, and Germ Fighters Lead to Hardier Germs.

But this may finally be changing.

Dan Shapley of The Daily Green tells us about a petition has been filed by the Food and Water Watch to the Food and Drug Administration, making the following claims:

The presence of triclosan in the human body (as evidenced by scientificstudies of its activity in blood, urine and breast milk) imposes an immense and dangerous ―body burden. This presence raises concerns about a multitude of threats to humans;

Bacterial resistance to antibiotic medications and antibacterial cleansers is just one category of threats emanating from the growing body burden of triclosan. Suchresistance renders humans (especially vulnerable subpopulations) wide open to bacteria-induced illnesses and death;

Endocrine disruption is another potential result of triclosan bioaccumulation in the body. This effect, in turn, poses serious threats to thyroid and other organ functions, and it can also influence the development of cancer;

Wastewater contamination by triclosan is a serious health threat. Importantly, triclosan products used in the home and in the workplace typically yield residues that flow into wastewater from rinsing, cleaning and other normal activities. Because these residues are not rendered harmless by the wastewater treatment process, they are free to reenter the environment—and ultimately the human body.

And they put this stuff in toothpaste???

The list of organizations supporting the petition is extensive and impressive, and includes the Sierra Club, the Center for Environmental Health, the Natural Resources Defense Council and more. Perhaps the new and improved FDA will finally listen. Read the petition PDF here

brainwash-soap.jpg

Updated List of Products with Triclosan

Food and Water Watch provides an updated list of products that contain Triclosan:

Neutrogena Deep Clean Body Scrub Bar
Lever 2000 Special Moisture Response Bar Soap, Antibacterial
CVS Antibacterial Hand Soap
Dial Liquid Soap, Antibacterial Bar Soap
Softsoap Antibacterial Liquid Hand Soap
Cetaphil Gentle Antibacterial Cleansing Bar
Clearasil Daily Face Wash
Clean & Clear Oil Free Foaming Facial Cleanser
Dawn Complete Antibacterial Dish Liquid
Ajax Antibacterial Dish Liquid
Colgate Total Toothpaste
Right Guard Sport Deodorant
Old Spice Red Zone, High Endurance and Classic Deodorants
Vaseline Intensive Care Antibacterial Hand Lotion

Support Companies That Do Not Use Triclosan

CleanWell
LUSH
Nature’s Gate
Vermont Country
Naked Soap Works
MiEssence
Purell Instant Hand Sanitizer
Ivory
Paul’s Organic
Dr. Bronner’s Magic Soaps
Tom’s of Maine
The Natural Dentist
Listerine Essential Care
Peelu
Weleda
Toxic Free Basics

More on Triclosan:
There’s A Frog Disruptor In My Soap
Antibacterial Cleaners Do More Harm Than Good



Why Second Hand is Healthier for Your Baby
July 21, 2009, 11:58 AM
Filed under: Environmental Issues, Going Green; How and Why...

From Treehugger

by Christine Lepisto, Berlin on 07.19.09

baby clothes photo
Hand-me-downs. The very thought brings terror to any new parent who remembers the taunting children suffered for the sin of not having new possessions. We are uncertain already in the face of the daunting task of raising a tiny life to health, wealth and wisdom, without even the benefit of an owner’s manual! How do parents react? Consumerism. Buying new for the baby is a ritual of modern childbirth: new nursery, new car seats, new clothing.

Think again. The German Bundesinstituts für Risikobewertung (BfR, or National Institute for Risk Assessment) has warned that newborns need better consumer protection advocacy. Pediatrician Axel Hahn of the BfR explained: Many parents completely remodel the room for the nursery, without giving thought to the amount of harmful substances newborns face from the new furniture, paint and carpet. The conclusion? Second hand–even for baby clothing–is often the healthier choice.

Second hand articles have had time to naturally lose the dangerous chemicals which are most easily emitted or leached from the articles to which babies are exposed. New furniture, much of which emits formaldehyde from the glues and particle board constituents or chemicals added as flame retardants, will have rid itself of most of the harmful emissions by the time it comes up for second hand sale. Baby clothing has been through enough wash cycles to ensure the chemicals added during textile manufacturing and distribution are gone. And who can remember being upset by a few smudges in the paint or carpeting of their nursery?

The discussion was raised in the context of the seventh Forum for Consumer Protection in Berlin. Children are especially sensitive. They have a much larger ratio of skin surface to body size, respirate more quickly and have faster metabolic rates. Attendees of the forum were unified in the opinion that risk assessments done for adults can no longer be applied also for children.

Specialists at the Forum also discussed better labelling of chemical contents. Currently, only toxic product recipes are required to be reported to the BfR, for example from cleaners. But often the risks of chemicals are due to the sum amount of the exposure, of to exposure to a combination of different substances. The BfR proposes a coded system of disclosure of all chemicals in the products



affordable recycled drinking glasses
June 6, 2009, 12:38 PM
Filed under: Going Green; How and Why...

I have been looking for a long time for 100% recycled drinking glasses. I have found some beautiful ones for about $60 to $70 for 4 glasses!  Jeeez!, way too expensive for the average person…

I found these;

Rings Recycled Glass Beverage GlassDesigned to coordinate with our rings dinnerware.This beverage glass is made from 100% recycled glass and is perfect for juice, milk or a cool glass of water. Slip Resistant. The rings are positioned on the bottom half of the glass making it more slip resistant and the slightly tapered bottom is great for smaller hands.Dishwasher Safe. Not designed for use in Microwave ovens.Holds 12 fl oz.Made in Spain.Measures: 5 1/4" tall.  Due to its inherent nature and unique look, please note that the color of this recycled glass varies from green to light blue and greenfeet cannot guarantee that all pieces or styles will be the same color.

At $2.95 each they are extremely affordable.

Find them on image Click here.



“Green” kitchen scrubbies
June 5, 2009, 4:18 PM
Filed under: Going Green; How and Why...

There are a few items that I have been still using that are not “green”.  I have been looking for a good alternative to the plastic green kitchen scrubbies…they really work!  I use a loofah, cut in slices, to wash dishes with.  Works great and when I am through with it, it goes into the compost. 

But if a pot or dish has stuck on food that a long soak in water doesn’t work on…I still grab that green thing.  A few days ago I got determined to find an alternative, as my last one is almost dead.  I found this, at- http://www.worldchanging.com/

Biodegradable Dish Scrubbie Eases My Eco-Guilt

Emily Gertz
March 2, 2006 4:04 PM

sandclean.jpg Sometimes it’s the little things. Sure — it’s gotten easy to find great coffee that’s organic, bird-friendly, and Fair Trade in the average U.S. town or city, and the rBGH-free organic milk to drink it with. But what are the options to clean the coffee stains off of my mug? Usually some plastic scrubbie or abrasive pad — which I’ll have to throw away eventually. Contemplating that little scrubbie’s carbon-emission-intensive journey to some landfill three states away, where it will join gazillions of other throwaway plastic whatsits in eternal unbiodegradable rest, is painful enough to keep my mugs looking dingy.

Enter the Sandclean, a biodegradable scrubbie. "Lasts a long time and does not break, tear or shed pieces which might otherwise remain on dishes or get into food…will not rust or hurt your hands like steel wool. Works great on tea or coffee stains in teapots and cups!" Sounds great! And it even comes in two grits for mild or tough cleaning jobs.

The Sandclean scrubbie isn’t exactly cheap at $7.50 a pop. But it’ll be nice to have stain-free cups without consigning another plastic scrubbie to the landfill.

I also found these at- Simply natural logo

"Japanese ""Turtle"" Large Tawashi Vegetable Brush"

Japanese "Turtle" vegetable brushes are known in Japan as tawashi. Each is a completely natural scrub brush made from palm fibers, then is tightly bound with thick wire. It is the perfect utensil for scrubbing root vegetables and other items without bruising the skins. Also excellent for washing pots and pans, especially ones made from cast-iron, earthenware and stainless steel. Tawashi brushes also are fantastic for getting the crevasses of suribachi bowls and sushi mats clean. They are inexpensive and will outlast regular synthetic brushes. They’re even great for scrubbing clean wooden cutting boards, utensils or even bathtubs.

Tawashi Made with 100% Palm Fibers, with a metal hanging loop for easy drying and storage.

Click here to go to their website



No more tears……just cancer causing chemicals
June 5, 2009, 12:37 PM
Filed under: Environmental Issues, Going Green; How and Why...

This is from http://www.enviroblog.org/

May 28, 2009

nomoretears.gif

Baby products should not contain toxic ingredients, according to common sense as well as 40 + organizations lead by the Environmental Working Group (EWG) co-founded Campaign for Safe Cosmetics.

Just last week, the Campaign sent a letter to Johnson and Johnson asking that its products made for children don’t contain hidden carcinogenic contaminants 1,4-dioxane and formaldehyde.

No More Toxic Tub
The action comes after a recent Campaign-sponsored
No More Toxic Tub report that found those two contaminants in over 60 percent of the 48 products tested. Both 1,4-dioxane and formaldehyde are known carcinogens and formaldehyde can also trigger skin rashes. Like other toxic ingredients often found in your shampoo, lotion and deodorant, they are not limited in personal care products. In addition, since they are contaminants and not ingredients, they are not disclosed on product labels.

Not breaking the law isn’t good enough when the law is weak
The line of defense for the manufacturers has been the typical "we didn’t break the law" as well as the usual "small doses are insignificant." It is true that companies did not break the law. But it’s also true that the law -

the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) – is so weak that under it, the federal government wasn’t able to ban asbestos! A chemical responsible for at least 10,000 deaths a year in the U.S.

Low doses matter
The small doses are not insignificant because we are all exposed to chemicals in personal care products every day, several times a day. Those exposures are there in addition to exposures to other toxics in food we eat, water we drink, air we breathe and so forth. All of these exposures add up, and could lead to diseases later in life. 
The companies don’t have to use the toxic ingredients, as alternatives are available. Even Johnson and Johnson can make formaldehyde-free products, as they do in Japan.

Tell Johnson & Johnson to get rid of the toxic chemicals
Without a tough federal law that would require the chemicals in personal care products be safe, consumers are left out on their own to make the best purchasing decisions.

That’s why we created Skin Deep, a cosmetics database that can help you make informed decisions when it comes to toxic contained in personal care products you use.

Until the law is changed, you can join us and tell Johnson and Johnson that you don’t want these toxic chemicals in your baby’s shampoo and they should take it out!



Website for checking the toxicity of products you use
June 4, 2009, 11:48 PM
Filed under: Environmental Issues, Going Green; How and Why..., Skin Care

washing face Four years ago, my daughter Rachel started school to become an esthetician.  She brought home info on the new studies showing just how toxic parabans were and their link to breast cancer.  I immediately went through my beauty products and shampoos and conditioners.  Almost all of them had parabans and they were all from the health food store!  I went to work researching toxicity in cosmetics, ending up switching products and in time developed my own skin cleanser.  During that next year almost every product line in the health food store reformulated their products to remove this cheap and toxic preservative. 

One of the tools I used for my research was the Environmental Working Groups’ website, Skin Deep.  It has the white papers (toxicity reports) on almost every product I was using. 

Skin Deep is a safety guide to cosmetics and personal care products brought to you by researchers at the Environmental Working Group.

Skin Deep pairs ingredients in more than 42,000 products against 50 definitive toxicity and regulatory databases, making it the largest integrated data resource of its kind. Why did a small nonprofit take on such a big project? Because the FDA doesn’t require companies to test their own products for safety.

Get started here to learn what’s in your personal care products:

Skin Deep



Dishwasher vs.. Hand washing dishes

A few months ago, Colin Beaven printed a article I wrote on his fabulous blog, No Impact ManYou can read the whole article here-  Thirty-one tips for reducing your impact while saving moneyA reader made this comment….

Alison said…   Thanks so much for the tips! I work with Electrolux and in the spirit of conserving water, have another tip to share: use your dishwasher instead of washing dishes by hand!

I was shocked to find out that it takes an average of 27 gallons of water to wash a load of dishes by hand but only 5 gallons to wash the same size load in a modern dishwasher! That means that a household can save 4,730 gallons of water per year by leaving hand washing in the dust! The Water Savings calculator from Electrolux breaks down results to show the effects of conserving water on a household, town, state and national level: www.electrolux.com/watersavings_us. Hope this helps your readers! :)

I wanted to address the fact, as I said in my article, that I use tow dishpans, each with slightly more than a gallon of water in each one.  When I am through with that water I pour it on my flower bed.  I use organic dish soap, but still do not use the water on veggies.  Here is a picture of the flower bed, just outside my kitchen where the water goes.  I have never turned on the outside spigot to water these flowers.

Picture 135

I am not using any electricity while I am washing those dishes, I supply the energy!

It is FAR more economical to do the dishes this way; no cost of manufacturing that dishwasher, no paying to transport it to the store, no electricity to run it.  I run my hot water heater a half hour a day, during off-peak hours, it is fully insulated.  This gives me a quick shower, normal use of water for dishwashing, etc.  Most of the year I use the solar shower in my back yard.  I do not use a flush toilet, I use a sawdust toilet.  My water bill is a 1/10 of what it used to be, and I have always been careful!

There’s no comparison!



The Economic impact of eating organically

organic-box

or·gan·ic;

1. Of, relating to, or derived from living organisms: organic matter.

2. Of, relating to, or affecting a bodily organ: an organic disease.

3. Having properties associated with living organisms.

4. Resembling a living organism in organization or development; interconnected.

Someone commented to me that it wasn’t frugal to eat organically.  I guess that is true for most people who decide to eat the same, the only change being buying all the same “products”, just switching to the organic version.  That will definitely cause a huge increase in the amount you spend each week. 

When I say organic I mean it on a different level than simply switching brands.  I think of it as doing things on the most basic levels, making things from scratch. In other words I buy FOOD, not products.  A bottle of organic salad dressing is expensive.  Make it from scratch and the price falls substantially.  I am also not paying for the packaging it came in.  I often get to Friday, trash day in my neighborhood, with nothing in my trash can to take to the curb.  I buy in bulk, take my cloth bags to the store, use muslin bags for bulk items.  A mango or avocado needs no package, no label.   I feel disconnected from myself and the earth when I buy a box of cereal.  And it’s not organic, not live. When I hold a mango in my hand, it has energy, live nutrients, it screams at you to dive in.  Real organic grass fed beef gives us vitamins and minerals not present in feed-lot animals. To conserve, remember to conserve, feels like loving the earth, myself, all people.  I used cloth diapers for all my kids because the cost was insane in every way, financially, environmentally, how comfy they are.  To buy plastic just to throw it away has always felt like blasphemy to me!  Then there is the money difference, no comparison. 

But buying all organics, buying food that is intensely nutritious is really a great way to save!  The huge difference is in your health. I have had very few doctor bills since I began eating to truly meet my nutrient needs.  Up until 1986, when I stopped eating grains and dairy, I had constant health problems.  At that point I was eating what everyone considered a perfect vegetarian diet.  I got well, and have stayed well, have not had to take any antibiotics whatsoever for anything except when I had ankle surgery. Not one of my children, who range from 8 to 37, has ever had a cavity.  They have rarely needed to go to the doctor. 

68% of Americans are over weight.  That means they are malnourished.  When we eat a traditional human diet, healthy fats, meats, eggs and fruits and vegetables, we meet our nutrient needs, we don’t get sick…which saves a tremendous amount of money on doctor bills, prescriptions, lost days from work.  When we eat well we have plenty of energy which impacts how effective we are as people. It impacts our relationships. It effects how mentally alert we are, how organized we are…and how happy we are.  Not getting enough healthy saturated fats leads to depression, hormone imbalances, an impaired immune system, obesity.  Foods that are nutrient deficient (grains, flours, dairy) take the place in the body from foods that actually make us healthier. 

Eating organically, simply, is good for us and the planet.

 



My latest switch to non-electric appliances…
May 27, 2009, 10:52 PM
Filed under: Coffee, Going Green; How and Why...

 

Ta Daaaaa…

Picture 201 Isn’t it a beauty? A Zazzenhaus coffee mill. The truth of the matter is that by the time I get the coffee ground I am wide awake!  Great for the biceps! Check out Sweet Maria’s Coffee site.  Organic green coffee beans, half the price of roasted.  You can roast your own coffee in popcorn air-popper.  A great site, a blog, an education in coffee.

After I took the picture, I noticed the bottle behind the grinder..

Picture 205 Notice the plant lights above all the veggies…

And the shell beside it… I found this about 2 feet down in my garden…

Picture 209



When Local Goes Industrial
May 23, 2009, 1:11 PM
Filed under: Going Green; How and Why...

From the Organic Consumers Association;

Sustainability Tip of the Week

The local food movement is gaining enough popularity to capture the interest of big business. Some of the biggest corporate food companies are looking for ways to greenwash their products. Although it sure beats sourcing their crops from overseas and is a step in the right direction, the following marketing claims can be misleading since the actual processing of these often factory-farm grown products may be anything but local:

–Frito-Lay North America owned by PepsiCo is trying to portray Lay’s potato chips as a local food in the regions where the potatoes are grown.

–ConAgra is trying to say that because Hunt’s canned tomatoes are mostly grown within 120 miles of its processing plant in Oakdale, California, that makes them "local" for Oakdale, and maybe even Californians.

–Kraft is trying to figure out whether people in Wisconsin will buy more pickles if they know the cucumbers that go into a jar of Claussen’s are grown there.

Learn More



Microwaves are a great way to conserve in the kitchen

I have worked at several natural foods kitchens over the years who refused to use microwaves.  They considered then unnatural, dangerous, harmful to food. 

I disagree.  Microwaves are a great way to cut down on energy use and heat in the kitchen.  That’s because its energy goes straight into heating the food, not the air or a pan which surrounds it.  Now, don’t get me wrong, I am not cooking tender greens in there, nor trying to bake weird microwavable brownies, or food in plastic bags (yecchhh)..

But a microwave is awesome for;  melting chocolate, heating up a cup of water for tea (then the mug is warm, too!), softening butter or coconut oil.  It is also great for getting a baking potato or sweet potato piping hot to then finish in the oven. Same for winter squashes, or eggplant for Baba Ganoush.  But never for cooking broccoli, tender greens, cooking meats.



Water-Saving Sub-irrigation on a Cairo Rooftop
May 19, 2009, 12:00 AM
Filed under: Gardening, Going Green; How and Why...

CairoRooftopGarden

This is from Inside Urban Green

The Solar Cities blog is about rooftop solar water heaters that are an energy efficient alternative to electric heaters.

This photo of a Cairo, Egypt rooftop with a solar water heater included the vegetable garden benches to the right. It looks to me that the containers on the vegetable benches are watered the same way that container plants are sub-irrigated in green houses around the world.

It is a little known fact in the consumer market that most container plants are watered by sub-irrigation using an ebb and flow system, either on benches or on a concrete floor.

There is no narrative on the blog about the vegetable garden but the robust health of these plants leads me to believe that the containers are sub-irrigated.

Note the plastic liners. Water collected in these basins (or added to them) will rise up by capillary action though the drain holes in the nursery pots. It is a far more efficient and water-conserving method then either hose watering or drip-irrigation.

If sub-irrigation is a more productive, water-conserving method in the greenhouse, why aren’t we all using it for our houseplants and container vegetables? Think about it.

Even though my garden outside is thriving, I keep moving plants inside…they grow faster, the sub-irrigated containers were all recycled from restaurants or friends, and the health food store.  They droop for a day and then take off…I am getting one cherry tomato a day right now,  Up from one a week for the last month.  I fought back the spider mites with Neem oil, the strawberries are flowering again.  And there is something very powerful about creating an inside environment…controlling all aspects (except the millions of microbial activities).. 

My house feel more alive, I love living with more plants.  There was never time but for a few at a time as I was raising my kids. 

The lettuces are an inch high, I’m nibbling.  The Swiss chard is 2 inches tall…yummmm, I can’t wait.  The beets are aggressively popping out of the soil, they all germinated! 

And I swear the plant lights must be great light therapy for me too, I find myself dancing a lot, again….maybe it’s the growing stuff…the peace…no kids at home…whoops, did I say that out loud. I love ya’ll…

The plants are thriving…so am I…my desserts are selling well in Riverside…Sheff’s Everyday Gourmet



Florida Friendly Landscaping
May 17, 2009, 12:41 PM
Filed under: Gardening, Going Green; How and Why...

I found this great site that lets you do a search according to your individual criteria (soil, light, annual, etc.)

Florida Friendly Plant Database header image

Fla freindly plants

Identify the Florida-friendly plants, including Florida native plants, that will work in your  yard or landscape design. The database contains nearly 380 trees, palms, shrubs, flowers, groundcovers, grasses and vines that are recommended by University of Florida/IFAS horticulture experts. The plants included in the database are available at nurseries throughout Florida.

Check it out-  Florida Friendly Landscaping



Another Reason To Not Buy Processed Food

I tell my nutrition client to not buy foods that need labels.  It is easy to hold a mango in your hands and know what it is, how it grew.  Not so with boxed or packaged “products”.

Read on…

Food Companies Are Placing the Onus for Safety on Consumers

By MICHAEL MOSS in the NY Times

Published: May 14, 2009

The frozen pot pies that sickened an estimated 15,000 people with salmonella in 2007 left federal inspectors mystified. At first they suspected the turkey. Then they considered the peas, carrots and potatoes.

The pie maker, ConAgra Foods, began spot-checking the vegetables for pathogens, but could not find the culprit. It also tried cooking the vegetables at high temperatures, a strategy the industry calls a “kill step,” to wipe out any lingering microbes. But the vegetables turned to mush in the process.

So ConAgra — which sold more than 100 million pot pies last year under its popular Banquet label — decided to make the consumer responsible for the kill step. The “food safety” instructions and four-step diagram on the 69-cent pies offer this guidance: “Internal temperature needs to reach 165° F as measured by a food thermometer in several spots.”

Increasingly, the corporations that supply Americans with processed foods are unable to guarantee the safety of their ingredients. In this case, ConAgra could not pinpoint which of the more than 25 ingredients in its pies was carrying salmonella. Other companies do not even know who is supplying their ingredients, let alone if those suppliers are screening the items for microbes and other potential dangers, interviews and documents show.

Yet the supply chain for ingredients in processed foods — from flavorings to flour to fruits and vegetables — is becoming more complex and global as the drive to keep food costs down intensifies. As a result, almost every element, not just red meat and poultry, is now a potential carrier of pathogens, government and industry officials concede.

In addition to ConAgra, other food giants like Nestlé and the Blackstone Group, a New York firm that acquired the Swanson and Hungry-Man brands two years ago, concede that they cannot ensure the safety of items — from frozen vegetables to pizzas — and that they are shifting the burden to the consumer. General Mills, which recalled about five million frozen pizzas in 2007 after an E. coli outbreak, now advises consumers to avoid microwaves and cook only with conventional ovens. ConAgra has also added food safety instructions to its other frozen meals, including the Healthy Choice brand.

Peanuts were considered unlikely culprits for pathogens until earlier this year when a processing plant in Georgia was blamed for salmonella poisoning that is estimated to have killed nine people and sickened 27,000. Now, white pepper is being blamed for dozens of salmonella illnesses on the West Coast, where a widening recall includes other spices and six tons of frozen egg rolls.

The problem is particularly acute with frozen foods, in which unwitting consumers who buy these products for their convenience mistakenly think that their cooking is a matter of taste and not safety.

Federal regulators have pushed companies to beef up their cooking instructions with the detailed “food safety” guides. But the response has been varied, as a review of packaging showed. Some manufacturers fail to list explicit instructions; others include abbreviated guidelines on the side of their boxes in tiny print. A Hungry-Man pot pie asks consumers to ensure that the pie reaches a temperature that is 11 degrees short of the government-established threshold for killing pathogens. Questioned about the discrepancy, Blackstone acknowledged it was using an older industry standard that it would rectify when it printed new cartons.

Government food safety officials also point to efforts by the Partnership for Food Safety Education, a nonprofit group founded by the Clinton administration. But the partnership consists of a two-person staff and an annual budget of $300,000. Its director, Shelley Feist, said she has wanted to start a campaign to advise consumers about frozen foods, but lacks the money.

Estimating the risk to consumers is difficult. The industry says that it is acting with an abundance of caution, and that big outbreaks of food-borne illness are rare. At the same time, a vast majority of the estimated 76 million cases of food-borne illness every year go unreported or are not traced to the source.

Home Cooking

Some food safety experts say they do not think the solution should rest with the consumer. Dr. Michael T. Osterholm, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research and Policy at the University of Minnesota, said companies like ConAgra were asking too much. “I do not believe that it is fair to put this responsibility on the back of the consumer, when there is substantial confusion about what it means to prepare that product,” Dr. Osterholm said.

And the ingredient chain for frozen and other processed foods is poised to get more convoluted, industry insiders say. While the global market for ingredients is projected to reach $34 billion next year, the pressure to keep food prices down in a recession is forcing food companies to look for ways to cut costs.

Ensuring the safety of ingredients has been further complicated as food companies subcontract processing work to save money: smaller companies prepare flavor mixes and dough that a big manufacturer then assembles. “There is talk of having passports for ingredients,” said Jamie Rice, the marketing director of RTS Resource, a research firm based in England. “At each stage they are signed off on for quality and safety. That would help companies, if there is a scare, in tracing back.”

But government efforts to impose tougher trace-back requirements for ingredients have met with resistance from food industry groups including the Grocery Manufacturers Association, which complained to the Food and Drug Administration: “This information is not reasonably needed and it is often not practical or possible to provide it.”

Now, in the wake of polls that show food poisoning incidents are shaking shopper confidence, the group is re-evaluating its position. A new industry guide produced by the group urges companies to test for salmonella and cites recent outbreaks from cereal, children’s snacks and other dry foods that companies have mistakenly considered immune to pathogens.

Research on raw ingredients, the guide notes, has found salmonella in 0.14 percent to 1.3 percent of the wheat flour sampled, and up to 8 percent of the raw spices tested.

ConAgra’s pot pie outbreak began on Feb. 20, 2007, and by the time it trailed off nine months later 401 cases of salmonella infection had been identified in 41 states, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which estimates that for every reported case, an additional 38 are not detected or reported.

It took until June 2007 for health officials to discover the illnesses were connected, and in October they traced the salmonella to Banquet pot pies made at ConAgra’s plant in Marshall, Mo.

While investigators who went to the plant were never able to pinpoint the salmonella source, inspectors for the United States Department of Agriculture focused on the vegetables, a federal inspection document shows.

ConAgra had not been requiring its suppliers to test the vegetables for pathogens, even though some were being shipped from Latin America. Nor was ConAgra conducting its own pathogen tests.

The company says the outbreak and management changes prompted it to undertake a broad range of safety initiatives, including testing for microbes in all of the pie ingredients. ConAgra said it was also trying to apply the kill step to as many ingredients as possible, but had not yet found a way to accomplish it without making the pies “unpalatable.”

Its Banquet pies now have some of the most graphic food safety instructions, complete with a depiction of a thermometer piercing the crust.

Pressed to say whether the meals are safe to eat if consumers disregard the instructions or make an error, Stephanie Childs, a company spokeswoman, said, “Our goal is to provide the consumer with as safe a product as possible, and we are doing everything within our ability to provide a safe product to them.”

“We are always improving food safety,” Ms. Childs said. “This is a long ongoing process.”

The U.S.D.A. said it required companies to show that their cooking instructions, when properly followed, would kill any pathogens. ConAgra says it has done such testing to validate its instructions.

Getting to ‘Kill Step’

But attempts by The New York Times to follow the directions on several brands of frozen meals, including ConAgra’s Banquet pot pies, failed to achieve the required 165-degree temperature. Some spots in the pies heated to only 140 degrees even as parts of the crust were burnt.

A ConAgra consumer hotline operator said the claims by microwave-oven manufacturers about their wattage power could not be trusted, and that any pies not heated enough should not be eaten. “We definitely want it to reach that 165-degree temperature,” she said. “It’s a safety issue.”

In 2007, the U.S.D.A.’s inspection of the ConAgra plant in Missouri found records that showed some of ConAgra’s own testing of its directions failed to achieve “an adequate lethality” in several products, including its Chicken Fried Beef Steak dinner. Even 18 minutes in a large conventional oven brought the pudding in a Kid Cuisine Chicken Breast Nuggets meal to only 142 degrees, the federal agency found.

Besides improving its own cooking directions, ConAgra says it has alerted other frozen food manufacturers to the food safety issues.

But in the absence of meaningful federal rules, other frozen-dinner makers that face the same problem with ingredients are taking varied steps, some less rigorous. Jim Seiple, a food safety official with the Blackstone unit that makes Swanson and Hungry-Man pot pies, said the company tested for pathogens, but only after preliminary tests for bacteria that were considered indicators of pathogens — a method that ConAgra abandoned after its salmonella outbreak.

The pot pie instructions have built-in margins of error, Mr. Seiple said, and the risk to consumers depended on “how badly they followed our directions.”

Some frozen food companies are taking different approaches to pathogens. Amy’s Kitchen, a California company that specializes in natural frozen foods, says it precooks its ingredients to kill any potential pathogens before its pot pies and other products leave the factory.

Using a bacteriological testing laboratory, The Times checked several pot pies made by Amy’s and the three leading brands, and while none contained salmonella or E. coli, one pie each of two brands — Banquet, and the Stouffer’s brand made by Nestlé — had significant levels of T. coliform.

These bacteria are common in many foods and are not considered harmful. But their presence in these products include raw ingredients and leave open “a potential for contamination,” said Harvey Klein, the director of Garden State Laboratories in New Jersey.

A Nestlé spokeswoman said the company enhanced its food safety instructions in the wake of ConAgra’s salmonella outbreak.

Danger in the Fridge

ConAgra’s episode has raised its visibility among victims like Ryan Warren, a 25-year-old law school student in Washington. A Seattle lawyer, Bill Marler, brought suit against ConAgra on behalf of Mr. Warren’s daughter Zoë, who had just turned 1 year old when she was fed a pot pie that he says put her in the hospital for a terrifying weekend of high fever and racing pulse.

“You don’t assume these dangers to be right in your freezer,” said Mr. Warren, who settled with ConAgra. He does not own a food thermometer and was not certain his microwave oven met the minimum 1,100-wattage requirement in the new pot pie instructions. “I do think that consumers bear responsibility to reasonably look out for their well-being, but the entire reason for this product to exist is for its convenience.”

Public health officials who interviewed the Warrens and other victims of the pot-pie contamination found that fewer than one in three knew the wattage of their microwave ovens, according to the C.D.C. report on the outbreak. The report notes, however, that nearly one in four of the victims reported cooking their pies in conventional ovens.

For more than a decade, the U.S.D.A. has also sought to encourage consumers to use food thermometers. But the agency’s statistics on how many Americans do so are discouraging. According to its Web site, not quite half the population has one, and only 3 percent use it when cooking high-risk foods like hamburgers. No data was available on how many people use thermometers on pot pies.

Note from Millie-   I find myself teaching clients how to use a food thermometer to learn to cook meat correctly.  Most people do not know how to use one or do not own one.  This is a prime example where we put our lives in big business’ hands.  Personally, I make all my food from scratch; real mayonnaise, salad dressings, tortillas…you know what the ingredients are!   

Some very important first steps;

1) buy only organic FREE RANGE meat, NOT feed lot meat.

2) avoid packaged, boxed, canned foods. Eat whole, real, unprocessed food; meat, healthy saturated fats (buuter, coconut oil), fruits and veggies.

3) start growing your own in sub-irrigated 5 gallon buckets.

What can you do?  Eat only locally grown food, buy from the Farmers Market, start growing your own…..read more;

Slow Foodimage 

http://www.slowfoodusa.org/index.php



New York To Stop Buying Bottled Water For State Agencies.
May 13, 2009, 9:11 PM
Filed under: Going Green; How and Why...

I found this at The Good Human

image

May 11th, 2009 • david

Hurray! Another state will stop with the bottled water nonsense! San Francisco banned the use of city money to buy single-serving plastic bottles of water back in 2007, and now New York is following suit. Governor David Patterson signed an Executive Order that will phase out the purchase and use of bottled water at state agency facilities. This is amazing news, and one that I hope will encourage other states and state agencies to ban the purchase of water in plastic bottles with state monies. From Water & Wastewater:

The Executive Order will phase out the expenditure of state funds for the purchase of single serve bottles and larger, cooler-sized bottles for water consumed at agency facilities. The measure requires each executive agency to develop and implement a plan to phase out expenditures for bottled water and provide alternative water sources such as ordinary tap water fountains and dispensers.

“Taxpayers have spent billions of dollars to ensure that we have clean drinking water supplies,” said Paterson. “If we are going to make such significant investments, we should reap the benefits and use that water. Our efforts will serve as an example for local governments, businesses, and residents to follow.”

I couldn’t agree more with Paterson’s statement, and hope it will truly have an impact on others to follow his (and Mayor Newsom’s) lead on this. I have written many times before about why we should not be buying bottled water, but just as a reminder, here are a few reasons…

  • By drinking tap water, you can avoid the fertilizer, pharmaceuticals, disinfectants, and other chemicals that studies have found in bottled water.
  • On a weekly basis, 37,800 18-wheelers are driving around the country delivering water.
  • It can take nearly 7 times the amount of water in the bottle to actually make the bottle itself. Buy a reusable bottle that lasts for a very long time instead
  • Tap water costs about $0.002 per gallon compared to the $0.89 to $8.26 per gallon charge for bottled water. If the water we use at home cost what even cheap bottled water costs, our monthly water bills would run $9,000.

Kudos to Governor Patterson for signing this order!

Continue Reading

I know ya’ll are sick of me haranguing you about not using disposable water bottles ever again. If you can’t find a “green” alternative, I personally love my Kleen Kanteen. I’m going on 2 years now with it.

kleen kanteen blue  

Another product I really enjoy every day is my non-plastic travel mug from High WaveMade with pottery and stainless steel, it is beautiful and the lid is silicone.  That means no smell or taste of old coffee after the first few uses. Plastic seals always taste bad. And the best thing is really keeps coffee or tea hot, real hot!  And the 12.00 price tag makes it real sweet.

high wave mug High wave mug red white high wave mugs multi

I do not like to expose my food to any plastic at all, or use disposables, so sandwich bags are out.  These container from Sigg are great for lunches. I found them at Reusablebags.com



A Very Green Greenhouse
May 11, 2009, 11:40 AM
Filed under: Gardening, Getting By on Less, Going Green; How and Why...

March 11, 2009

WindowsGreenhouse

What a cool idea for building your own greenhouse. There are many sun-lit spaces in the city where this could work, maybe even on a rooftop. One of the resource we have in abundance in the city is used building material. There is demolition material everywhere.

You will need some DIY carpentry skills for this project but it seems like one worth doing.

Could it be any more green? Yes, if you fill it with sub-irrigated grow boxes or buckets. With adequate structural support, it could even have a sub-irrigated green roof. What a food production factory you could have! 

Source: Instructables

Via: re-nest an Apartment Therapy blog



What I learned from camping i really appreciate now!
May 5, 2009, 11:17 PM
Filed under: Getting By on Less, Going Green; How and Why...

 

You Grow Girl had this to to say about camping-   Camping is a reminder of how easy we have it, a demonstration in the excesses in our modern lives that we can probably do without. I learned that baking soda really is the miracle powder. You can use it to scrub dishes, wash hair, brush teeth, and remedy bee stings. It really doesn’t taste that bad when used as toothpaste. Check out here gardening blog, it is delightful.

I grew up using baking soda to brush my teeth with.  I have been using it to clean with now for 30 years.  She’s right, it is great for lots of things!  My favorite use for it is an exfoliatant; it is a fruit acid.  I use it in my skin cleanser that I make myself using honey, baking soda, almond oil, rose oil, a few drops of Dr. Bonners, and lavender oil. Mixed with fresh lemon juice it will fade brown spots on your face (hydroquinone is soo toxic!).  I have had fifty dollar facials that did not work as well as these simple, non-toxic recipes!  I quit using Retin-a and glycolic about 6 years ago, and do not miss them at all.  And my skin still looks amazing for 55! 

Copy of Millie 

I grew up camping in central Florida 3 months out of the year, every year from age 5 until I was 20.  We started out camping at Juniper State Parks for a few weeks at a time.  Then after that we camped on the banks of the Okeechobee from the time school got out until it started again in early September.  We used no running water, no electric, no TV, no radios.  Primitive camping in a tent. 

image

I have always been an environmentalist, but last year I was finally able to begin growing veggies and fruit, begin using  greywater for all my flowers, built the rain barrels, work in the yard more.  My youngest child turned 18, as I nudged him out on his own, I began having way more time to do all this. But as I get more radical (doesn’t feel radical to me, but I guess it is by the raised eyebrows I see!) about conserving it strikes me that growing up the way I did prepared me to see these changes as, not inconvenient, but deeply satisfying. 

Us kids learned how to cook bread over coals, how to dinner, how to brush your teeth with just 8 ounces of water, how quickly to yank the oars in when alligator scraped the bottom of the boat, how to take off all day alone in a john boat and always find our way back, how to avoid snakes.  For years our toilet was a shovel and a roll of toilet paper. A bath was plunging into the creek no matter what the temperature, and watching the red eyes of the gators on the other side of the creek, about 50 feet away.  We learned how to never be bored, same as at home. We had no TV at home either, so we didn’t miss it a bit.  I fact, even at home we lived in the woods.  Our homes, at my grandparents and our parents, were in subdivisions, but were surrounded by miles of woods (this was southern Florida in the fifties and early sixties), huge Norfolk pines to play under and build forts, oak trees to climb and swing in, a citrus grove to play in.  We would eat oranges all day and not even go home til dinner..

I love living more primitively.  We all need to be acutely aware where our resources come from, how fragile it all is, what damage we are causing with our greed. 

Next time, hang the clothes on the line. Consider a sawdust toilet, Install a bidet, stop using all that toilet paper. Brush your teeth with one cup of water. Use the dish water that has nontoxic soap in it on the flower beds. Xeroscape.  Dust off that bicycle.  Get a Kleen Kanteen.  Route your shower water outside to the trees or non-edible shrubs.  Better yet, yank those azaleas and put in berries!

Consider going camping just for the weekend, it will open your eyes to how wasteful we can be when we have all the amenities.

 



A list of companies who supported lies about global warming
May 1, 2009, 2:27 PM
Filed under: Going Green; How and Why...

Thank you, again, NoImpactMan

A list of companies who supported lies about global warming

A list of companies who supported lies about global warming

Please email this in order to spread it around as a way to show the below companies that you refuse to accept their distorting our democracy and endangering us in the process.

On April 23, Andrew Revkin of the New York Times published a story proving conclusively that the so-called Global Climate Coalition, a group representing industries with profits tied to fossil fuels, knew that they were lying when they ran "an aggressive lobbying and public relations campaign against the idea that emissions of heat-trapping gases could lead to global warming."

According to Revkin:

… a document filed in a federal lawsuit demonstrates that even as the coalition worked to sway opinion, its own scientific and technical experts were advising that the science backing the role of greenhouse gases in global warming could not be refuted.

“The scientific basis for the Greenhouse Effect and the potential impact of human emissions of greenhouse gases such as CO2 on climate is well established and cannot be denied,” the experts wrote in an internal report compiled for the coalition in 1995.

A working democracy requires a correctly informed electorate. Deliberately lying to the public is a direct assault on the American system of democracy. To use power and money to lie to the American public is to distort our electoral process.

And to do it knowing what is at stake is just unfathomable. We are now at the point where we are near the climate tipping point. Without the efforts of the so-called Global Climate Coalition (GCC), and other organizations like it, we may have been able to get to work on this planetary problem a decade or even 20 years ago.

This is like a health insurance company refusing treatment to a child with cancer, except that we are talking about refusing treatment to billions of children–an entire planet’s worth. In the course of it’s work, according to SourceWatch, the GCC spent tens of millions of dollars on ad campaigns trying to stop action on global warming and made millions of dollars of contributions to politicians to influence their decisions.

The companies who exhibited this gross disregard for human life continue to wield power in the ongoing discussion about how to ameliorate the climate crisis. It is important to know, therefore, exactly which companies are prone to lie and distort the truth so we know not to believe them in the future.

For that reason, here, according to SourceWatch, is the list of members of the so-called Global Climate Coalition, who tried for so long to mislead us. I hope you’ll digg or stumble or email this post around to make sure it is seen and read and to show these companies that we won’t accept this kind of this behavior:

  • Air Transport Association
  • Allegheny Power
  • Aluminum Association, Inc.
  • American Automobile Manufacturers Association
  • American Commercial Barge Line Co.
  • American Farm Bureau Federation
  • American Forest & Paper Association
  • American Highway Users Alliance
  • American Iron and Steel Institute
  • American Petroleum Institute
  • American Portland Cement Alliance
  • Amoco
  • Association of American Railroads
  • Association of International Automobile Manufacturers
  • Atlantic Richfield Coal Company
  • Baker Refineries
  • Bethlehem Steel
  • BHP Minerals
  • Chamber of Shipping of America
  • Chemical Manufacturers Association
  • Chevron
  • Chrysler Corporation
  • Cinergy
  • CONRAIL
  • Consumers Energy
  • Council of Industrial Boiler Owners
  • CSX Transportation, Inc.
  • Cyprus-Amax
  • Dow Chemical Company
  • Drummond Company
  • Duke Power Company
  • DuPont
  • Eastman Chemical
  • Edison Electric Institute
  • ELCON
  • ExxonMobil
  • Fertilizer Institute
  • Ford Motor Company
  • General Motors
  • Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
  • Greencool
  • Hoechst Celanese Chemical Group
  • Illinois Power Company
  • Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.
  • McDonnell-Douglas
  • Mobil Corporation
  • National Association of Manufacturers
  • National Lime Association
  • National Mining Association
  • National Ocean Industries Association
  • National Petrochemical and Refiners Association
  • Natural Rural Electric Cooperative Association
  • Norfolk Southern
  • Northern Indiana Public Serv. Co.
  • Ohio Edison
  • Parker Drilling Company
  • Process Gas Consumers
  • Shell
  • Society of the Plastic Industry
  • Southern Company
  • Steel Manufacturers Association
  • TECO Energy Inc.
  • Texaco
  • U.S. Chamber of Commerce
  • USX Corporation
  • Union Carbide
  • Union Pacific
  • Virginia Power
  • Western Fuels Association